Residence Rules UK?

Now the dust is settling – a little – on Finance Act 2008, HMRC has issued an updated version of IR20.

The revised booklet has some deletions from the previous versions and an extended text about the operation of the new remittance basis charge. Most usefully there is a flow chart which shows how the charge works. I have a copy pinned to my office wall for quick reference!

There will undoubtedly be continuing uncertainty about the new rules but at least we will know what HMRC’s view is in the main areas. Nonetheless so much of the rules relating to residence are a matter of interpretation and it is wise to seek advice if you are unclear about your personal situation.

Further Climb-down on Non-Dom Tax Changes

The Telegraph is reporting a further climb-down on the proposed changes. According to senior HM Revenue and Customs officials.

“…non-doms will now be able to elect to make a "deemed sale" to rebase the value of their British and overseas assets.”

This appears only to relate to assets held with in offshore trusts and seems to have arisen following the letter from Dave Hartnett which stated…

“….there will be no retrospection in the treatment of trusts and the tax changes will not apply to gains accrued or realised prior to the changes coming into effect.”

No official announcement has been made and none is likely before the Budget on 12 March. So, if the trustees of your offshore trust were considering a “bed & breakfasting” exercise before 6 April 2008 they may want to put it on hold until the Budget.

Another Residence Case - This Time The Revenue Lose

There have been a number of tax cases recently regarding the question of residence in the UK for tax purposes. In both the Gaines-Cooper and Barrett cases HM Revenue & Customs established that the taxpayers remained resident in the UK. In a recent case heard before the Special Commissioners concerning a British Airways pilot the Revenue were unsuccessful. Full details of the case can be found here. Briefly the case involved a pilot who was born South Africa and moved to Kenya as a minor where he acquired British citizenship. He returned to South Africa while still a minor and, after completing his education there, trained as a pilot. He married a UK citizen (in South Africa) but separated after a few years when his wife and children returned to the UK.

He eventually took up employment with BA being based at Gatwick/Heathrow, flying long haul to South Africa, and bought a house near Gatwick. In 1997, when his marriage was dissolved, he decided to live in South Africa and “commute” to the UK for his work.

After 1997 the only time he spent in the UK was a few days before and after each flight staying at his house near Gatwick which he had retained. In the meantime he established a home in South Africa, buying a home near his parents, joining various flying clubs and establishing a social life there. However, using a day count he spent more than 90 days a year in the UK (although less than 183 days).

The Revenue maintained that he had not made a distinct break from the UK and therefore continued to be resident and ordinarily resident in the UK. The Special Commissioner, Dr Nuala Brice rejected both these contentions. It is not known whether the Revenue will appeal.

Retreat on Non-Dom Tax Changes

Following my blog of yesterday it now appears that the Chancellor has retreated on some of his proposals for the taxation of Non-Doms. Dave Hartnett, the Acting Chairman of HM Revenue and Customs has posted a letter on the Revenue website to clarify the Government’s intention in four areas where concerns have been raised.

According to the letter Hartnett wants….

“to make clear that the Government’s intention – which will be set out in legislation to be brought forward – has always been to ensure that:

  • those using the remittance basis will not be required to make any additional disclosures about their income and gains arising abroad. So long as they declare their remittances to the UK and pay UK tax on them, they will not be required to disclose information on the source of the remittances; 
  • there will be no retrospection in the treatment of trusts and the tax changes will not apply to gains accrued or realised prior to the changes coming into effect;
  • money brought into the UK to pay the £30,000 charge will not itself be taxable;

    and
  • it will continue to be possible to bring art works into the UK for public display without incurring a charge to tax.

    In addition, we will continue to discuss with the US authorities how the £30,000 charge can become creditable against US tax.”


The full text of Hartnett’s letter can be found here.

This clarification is being interpreted as a retreat or a climb down by the Chancellor. However, a Treasury spokesman has been quoted as saying that the intentions have not changed it is just that the draft legislation has gone “slightly awry”. There are still a number of issues to be resolved and I expect we will have to wait until the Budget on 12 March to get further details.

Keep on watching this space.

 

More detail on Non UK Domicile and Residence changes

We have now had a chance to digest the draft legislation issued last week although it cannot be said to sit easily in the stomach. It is complex and retrospective in some key respects. I am chairing a working party of the ICAEW to lead its responses and meet with parliamentary and treasury representatives to lobby on our particular areas of concern. We will keep you posted of developments in this blog but it appears that the fundamental points of policy are fixed.

A detailed summary of the changes and how you might be affected are found in our latest edition of Tax Plus issued on Friday. You can read Tax Plus by clicking here.

Draft Legislation for new Non Domicile rules now available

After some considerable wait HM Revenue & Customs and customs have finally published the draft legislation covering changes to rules for taxing UK residents who are not domiciled in the UK.

These are more wide ranging than expected and will have a significant impact on not only Non Doms but also beneficiaries and settlors of offshore trusts whether or not they are Non Doms.

There is a significant amount of new legislation to be considered and it may be amended before (or after!) 5 April 2008. Some points that are proposed are.

  • Non Doms who have been here for seven years (out of ten) will have to pay £30,000 a year to elect for the Remittance Basis.
  • All Non Doms claiming the remittance basis will lose personal allowances and capital gains tax annual exemptions. Subject to a de minimis limit of £1,000 of overseas income / gains.
  • Bringing non cash items to the UK such as works of art, cars, furniture, and jewellery will be treated as a remittance after 5 April 2008. If those items were purchased with overseas income or gains then the remittance could be taxable in the UK. If such items have already been brought into the UK and are used after 5 April 2008 the legislation as presently drafted, indicates that there will be a remittance which will be taxable.
  • Beneficiaries of offshore trusts who receive capital payments may be taxable on capital gains arising in the trust that have arisen as far back as 17 March 1998 (yes ten years ago!) or gains made at some point in the future.

There is much more to consider but if you are Non Domiciled or have an interest in an offshore trust it would be sensible to contact your accountant now. There are only a few weeks before the new rules become effective.

Not this week Darling...

Following reports of further meetings with business leaders it now seems that Mr Darling’s long delayed announcement regarding the capital gains tax regime will not now appear until next week according to the FT.

We are also still waiting for the draft legislation for the new Residence and Domicile rules. In a little over 10 weeks both sets of new rules are due to take effect and the uncertainty makes it very difficulty to plan.

CIOT draws attention to hidden penalty in new tax rules

The Chartered Institute of Taxation has highlighted the fact that a Private Members’ Bill (Disqualification from Parliament (Taxation Status) Bill) has been tabled in Parliament which proposes that those electing for the non-domiciled remittance basis of taxation will be disqualified from acting as an MP or Member of the House of Lords.

John Whiting, Chairman of the CIOT’s Management of Taxes Committee, says:

“One can understand the driving force at work here but there is also an important matter of tax principle. A taxpayer will, under the proposed non-domiciled rules, be given an option over two bases of taxation. Yet someone choosing one route is, seemingly, to be handed an extra penalty. It does seem a bad precedent if making what might be regarded as the wrong tax choice attracts adverse treatment in another area.”

This is an odd choice of words – by electing for the remittance basis it is likely that the tax bill will be reduced so this could hardly be an extra penalty!

It should be noted that this bill, like most Private Members’ Bills is unlikely to become law

Non-Doms - Consultative Document Published

Having indicated that the promised consultative document on Residence and Domicile would not be issued until the New Year it was surprising to see it appear on the Treasury website this morning.

In many ways it doesn’t take us much further forward as there are still many proposals and no draft legislation. The highlights are:

  • Non-doms who are resident for 7 out 10 years will have to pay a £30,000 levy each year to retain the remittance basis and they will lose personal allowances and capital gains annual exemptions.
  • Those who are resident for 10 out of 12 years will have an increased levy of £50,000 a year. 
  • Those who are resident for 17 out of 20 years will be deemed UK domicile and lose the possibility of the remittance basis altogether.

This last proposal will have a significant impact on many long term UK resident Non-doms. It should be noted that this is Government thinking at present not fixed proposals.

Watch this space for further news.

Non-Doms - Book now to avoid disappointment

As I am sure you are aware the last Budget and the recent Pre-Budget Report introduced some significant changes to our tax system that will have a major impact on the tax affairs of UK resident non-domiciled taxpayers. Regrettably, many changes have been announced but without any detailed, or draft legislation; I had hoped to have more concrete information to give you but as the changes are significant it is useful to provide some general pointers now.

It would be sensible for those affected to book a meeting now with their tax advisers for early in the New Year to discuss what action, if any, is needed. Please bear in mind that the tax return season culminates on 31 January so it may be difficult to arrange a meeting before February. We are anticipating being very busy and this will probably be the same across the profession.

The three headline changes that may affect Non-doms are:

Residence – a difference to the way in which days of presence are calculated. With effect from 6 April 2008 it appears that days of arrival and days of departure will count as days of presence. In practical terms a Monday to Friday visit will now count as 5 days instead of the 3 under present rules. Where day counting is critical to your status this will affect your plans significantly.

Domicile – significant changes to individual taxation if one claims the remittance basis. Broadly from 6 April 2008 you will no longer be able to claim personal allowances if you claim the remittance basis. If you have been UK resident for at least 7 years you will only be able to claim the remittance basis if you accept a £30,000 levy in addition to any tax payable for a year. It appears that this levy will not be creditable against tax in other jurisdictions so will be an absolute cost to you. If you do not pay the levy you will be taxed on a worldwide basis and the double tax treaties may offer some relief from double taxation. We will need to consider the arithmetic of your personal situation in some detail to advise you on the correct course of action.

Changes to the way in which gains in offshore trusts and companies are taxed are also proposed. These are presently tax free if you are not UK domiciled and we think that they will become taxable to an extent from 6 April 2008. Where you are the settlor or beneficiary of an offshore trust or where you own an offshore company there may be an incentive to accelerate remittances into the current tax year. As I said, we are working without draft legislation at present but we need to be in a position to act quickly if necessary

Capital gains tax – 

  • A flat rate of CGT at 18% is to be introduced from 6 April 2008.
  • Withdrawal of taper relief that currently applies to reduce a gain based on the length of ownership and the nature of the asset. Today, for non-business assets held for more than 10 years the effective rate of tax is 24% and for business assets held for more than 2 years is 10%
  • Withdrawal of the indexation relief that currently applies between March 1982 and April 1998. This relief had increased the tax base cost of an asset by amounts up to 104%

The impact of the changes can be very significant. Obviously some people will be better off under the new regime, and others will most definitely not be. If there is a possibility that a sale of any of the assets you hold is a likelihood in the relatively near future, then we do need to look to see if you are better off triggering a gain under the current regime and increasing the cost to be carried forward for calculating in the new regime, or whether you would definitely be better off doing nothing this side of April.

As mentioned above the months leading up to 5 April 2008 will be very busy for professional advisers so you should book your meeting now.

High Court Dismisses Appeal in Domicile Case

Just about a year ago there was much media coverage to the Special Commissioners case of Robert Gaines-Cooper v Revenue & Customs Commissioners which highlighted the question of whether days of arrival and departure should be included when calculating whether someone is resident in the UK for tax purposes. In that particular case the Revenue said that these days should be included but subsequently announced that in most cases they would not include them. However it was announced in the Pre-Budget report that, from April next year, the rules will be changed and days of arrival and departure will be counted in future. What was often overlooked was that the Gaines-Cooper case was primarily about the question of domicile rather than residence. Mr Gaines-Cooper decided to appeal against the decision and took the case to the High Court and last week Mr Justice Lewison handed down his decision . The case was taken on the premise that the Special Commissioner had erred on point of law in deciding that Mr Gaines-Cooper had acquired a domicile of choice in the Seychelles. The Judge found, after reviewing the Special Commissioners’ findings that it is

"impossible to say that the only true and reasonable conclusion was that Mr Gaines-Cooper acquired a domicile of choice in the Seychelles in 1976."

As such the Special Commissioners had not erred in law and the appeal was dismissed.

It has been announced that Mr Gaines-Cooper is seeking leave to take the case to the Court of Appeal. He is also seeking leave for judicial review on the residence question -Watch this space.

His position will not be helped by another Special Commissioners’ case decided recently.

In the case of Lee Barrett v HMRC it was held that Mr Barrett had not sufficiently broken his links with the UK to be considered not resident in the UK. This is a cautionary tale which shows that it is essential that documentary evidence such as airline tickets / boarding passes etc should be retained when trying to establish that you have left the UK. Amongst other things, the Revenue were able to establish from bank statements, that Mr Barrett had made withdrawals from UK cash machines some days after he claimed to have left the UK. It should be remembered also that mobile ’phone records, which are available to the Revenue, can be used to establish your location at any particular time.

Domicile... now the TUC joins the debate

It was reported yesterday The Observer , and in both The Guardian and The Independent today that The TUC has joined the campaign to abolish the current tax rules for those resident but not domiciled in the UK.

The Sunday Times on the other hand ran a report about a poll that suggested that “two people in every five are either planning to move abroad or have seriously considered doing so”.

Maybe the new Chancellor will touch on this in his first Pre-Budget report next month.